Profile

toastykitten: (Default)
toastykitten

May 2025

S M T W T F S
    1 2 3
45678910
11121314 151617
18192021222324
25262728293031

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
toastykitten: (Default)
I long ago gave up any pretense to privacy on the Internet. Even the "friendslock" feature on Livejournal - that I kind of consider a placebo like Airborne. It makes me feel better, but I know that given the right tools, anyone could hack it and get access to my entries.

Besides all the first issues that broke out - making all your email contacts "your friends" (obviously they didn't get anyone outside Google to test this), the ability to integrate with Twitter but not Facebook, it's almost impossible to turn off, unless you know what you're doing.

So if you're at all concerned about your own privacy for whatever reason, I wouldn't use it.

The user experience itself is kind of weird. Stuff from Google Reader is shared on Buzz, and then if people comment on any post you make, you're notified via email. Except Buzz is already in your email so all you'd have to do is click on the Buzz link to see your new updates. And then you're also notified in Google Reader of things that are shared from other people's Google Readers, which amounts to a total duplication of entries across a couple of spaces. Needless to say, it's pretty irritating. I'm sure you can turn it off, but how to turn it off is not obvious. Added to that is the fact that the people in your Buzz feed and your Reader feed are not necessarily all the same, nor are they your same Twitter followers. It's mind-numbing.

Also, I would not use Google Latitude unless you have a really good reason. If you do use it, make sure you turn it off when you're done. And make sure that it's only available to people you trust 100%. The only reason I use it is so Mark can see if I'm stuck in traffic or not.
Jan. 4th, 2007 10:38 pm

addicted

toastykitten: (Default)
This week I am addicted to:

  • Google everything
    • GMail - LOVE, LOVE, LOVE
    • GTalk - I need more people to get on this so I can waste time at work.
    • GoogleReader - I have stopped reading my Bloglines account because GoogleReader is sooo much more efficient. They just rolled out this new thing where it gives you statistics on how often you read your feeds, which feeds haven't updated, etc. It's perfect for my nonstop quest for information overload. I can tag the posts I like, star the ones I want to read later, even share them if I want on a separate page for other people to use. (Not that I've used that feature.)
    • GoogleNotebook - I just started using this seriously today, as a to-do list. It's easier than using the Google Homepage, which I find overly fussy.
  • rice crackers - I just bought some over at the Nijiya Market in San Mateo. It rocks - not only does it have all my required snacks, it contains a ton of unfamiliar vegetables and fresh sashimi and mochi ice cream. The Bay Area does not get better than this!
  • crossword puzzles - I am in the middle of reading an Umberto Eco book, and I can't help it; the book is not that compelling, so I read a chapter or two and then finish the rest of the train ride with the crossword puzzle book.
  • stationery - I wrote a few cards to people. You know what I'm really tempted to do? I'm tempted to make up one of those holiday letters that normal suburban people send out to everyone on their address book telling them what happened over the year. Mark got a couple from some family friends, and they are so cheery! Stuff like "I got elected president of the local photography club" and "we toilet-trained our kid really early and let me tell you it was tough!" I don't know why, but I find it adorable. It's not like we hear from them otherwise, but it's just nice to hear from people. Also, Daiso, a Japanese discount store just opened in the Serramonte Center, which means that there is more cute stationery waiting for me.
  • good food - I finally convinced Mark to stop shopping at Safeway for our produce and start shopping at Lunardi's, which has more expensive stuff, but is way, way, way fresher than anything we get at Safeway. I don't really have anything against Safeway; it's just that Safeway, despite its attempts to compete with places like Whole Foods and Trader Joe's by stocking nicer stuff, has an awful produce section. Both of us are trying to eat healthier, but we kept finding that we would waste a whole week's worth of mushrooms if we didn't eat them all in three days. With Lunardi's produce, we could keep stuff up to two weeks, because everything was much fresher, even the non-organic stuff. So maybe we're actually saving money in the end.
  • askMeFi - I am fascinated by a lot of the questions asked here - ranging from the blunt "How do I tell my wife she's fat?" to the more whimsical "What's the deal with French book spines?" to the philosophical "Why should I follow the news?" - there's always something of interest. And occasionally I find something that helps me.
Tags:
toastykitten: (Default)
Mark is sick, so not much going on tonight. Last night's Daily Show was hilarious. That isn't the only news story I've been following, though. I've been keeping track of the China&theInternet stories for the past few weeks, shaking my head, going, "Are you fucking kidding me?" for both the American and Chinese responses. Long list of links below, mostly taken from Slashdot.

This BBC Op-Ed from Bill Thompson claiming that Google's self-censorship in China makes sense. Business sense, that is. And for some reason, everyone else should be behind that because hey, there's censorship everywhere else, why not? I exaggerate, but really, what the FUCK?

Here's the thing that really annoys me about these arguments about the issue of censorship - that the idea that self-censorship is somehow more desirable or less dangerous than regular, state-enforced censorship.

Google, Yahoo, Microsoft, and Cisco invited to Capitol Hill for a meeting on U.S. business practices and censorship in China.
US tech firms that abet China censors face scrutiny
Bill Gates, the billionaire founder of Microsoft, took the rare step of standing up for arch-rival Google today as he argued that state censorship was no reason for technology companies not to do business in China. This quote just about killed me: "Software piracy is a problem that will likely be solved over time, because as Chinese-made technology evolves, the country’s respect for intellectual property rights will improve, he added." - Hey, has he seen the movie industry there lately?
US congressmen have condemned major IT firms including Microsoft and Google for helping China censor the internet.

The Justice Department asks a judge to approve Patriot Act e-mail monitoring without any evidence of criminal behavior.

Net-savvy outfits are finding ways to let citizens see banned sites - "The company distributes software, called FreeGate, which disguises the sites a person visits. In addition, DIT sends out mass e-mails to Chinese Web surfers for clients such as VOA, which is banned in China. The e-mails include a handful of temporary Web addresses that host off-limits content and springboards to other forbidden sites."

Executives from Google Inc. and other Internet companies head to Capitol Hill next week, where they will become feature players in an awkward debate: Are U.S. companies giving in to China too easily?

"I was asked the question the other day, do U.S. corporations have the obligation to promote democracy? That's the wrong question," says Rep. Chris Smith, the New Jersey Republican and chairman of the House human-rights subcommittee that is holding the hearing. "It would be great if they would promote democracy. But they do have a moral imperative and a duty not to promote dictatorship."

Ironically, the controversy comes as Google, Yahoo and others are fighting for "Internet freedom" in the U.S. Google is resisting a Justice Department request for information on user searches to help prosecute violations of a federal child-pornography law. Meanwhile, the company has joined competitors to resist plans by telephone and cable companies keen on exerting more control over Internet lines, which has led to concerns about discrimination and content blocking.


Rep. Chris Smith, R-N.J., is drafting a bill that would force Internet companies including Google, Yahoo and Microsoft to keep vital computer servers out of China and other nations the State Department deems repressive to human rights. - Good luck, Smith.

Chinese authorities are determined to stop "harmful information" from spreading through the Internet, but the controls it places on Web sites and Internet service providers in mainland China do not differ much from those employed by the United States and European countries, a senior Chinese official responsible for managing the Internet said today.

Ok, I've had enough of this. I'm going to sleep. Read Glutter for better coverage.
Jan. 26th, 2006 10:58 pm

freedom

toastykitten: (Default)
I'm still pissed that Google decided to censor its search results for the Chinese version of their search engine. Pissed, and disappointed, but not surprised.

I was, however, really surprised by all the praise that was initially heaped on Google for refusing to provide the U.S. government with search records the week before. First of all, it's not that fucking hard to say no to the U.S. government, especially if you are a large corporation making millions of dollars. Second of all, it took no courage. Courage would have meant standing up to the Chinese, meant saying no to gobs of money, and risking something - the anger of the Chinese government, business interests, etc.

This bullshit isn't what my parents signed up for.
Page generated May. 25th, 2025 12:19 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios